By UMUKORO CHANDI
In a series of startling revelations, our investigation has uncovered a complex web of legal and personal disputes involving Adaobi Alagwu and Dr. Ayeni, which raises significant questions about the integrity of their respective claims. Central to this investigation is the assertion that Alagwu, through her legal representatives, acted in defiance of the instruction of the court, allegedly motivated by financial gain. This situation has escalated to the point where a purported official statement was released, claiming legal legitimacy that our findings challenge.
Key to this unfolding drama is the assertion that Dr. Ayeni fulfilled his obligations by paying money on the child which is now classified as dowry. Worthy of note is Dr Ayeni is married under the Act and cannot conduct another marriage with another woman, and this fact is well noted by Adaobi. The payment which was made when Adaobi was about 6months pregnant, after constant pressure from her family, most especially her mother & the father was so that the child could carry the “Ayeni” name to avert traditional consequences. This payment has now been misconstrued as a dowry. This is consistent with the testimony presented by Dr. Ayeni in court and cannot be changed by the defense put forth by her lawyers on social media. After learning that Adaobi had been involved with other men, Tunde Ayeni retracted his consent, especially after concerns arose about the integrity of the paternity test.
Our investigation further indicates that he did not complete the necessary traditional marriage rites as per Ibo customs, which was deliberate The non-completion of the marriage rites were deliberate steps agreed by both parties in view of the reality that it would have been a null and void. Tunde Ayeni could not be involved in another union with any other party. Also, the Ibo customs clearly state that a bride price, or dowry, paid during a woman’s pregnancy is rendered null and void. Additionally, essential components of traditional marriage, such as the wine carriage and the ceremonial escort of the bride to her husband’s home, were reportedly absent.
Despite the apparent absence of these rites, Alagwu and her supporters insist on the validity of their marital claims. The contradictions within their narrative are striking. Photographic evidence presented by Alagwu during the dowry payment shows her in an advanced state of pregnancy, which she now contests—an assertion that raises eyebrows and calls into question the reliability of her statements. The adage “pictures don’t lie” takes on new meaning in this context, especially given that Alagwu herself published these images.
Moreover, Alagwu’s recent antics, including the display of a picture taken at her 30th birthday party with Dr. Ayeni, demonstrate a desperate attempt to validate her claims. A photograph from a social event carries little weight, especially considering that Ayeni has publicly denounced her. This raises the question: what value does such a photo hold when the man in question has repeatedly rejected any association with her and her child?
Further investigation into Adaobi’s personal history reveals some parallels with her mother’s past, who faced similar controversies, which included complexities surrounding a pregnancy with another man while still married to Adaobi’s father. This situation had a profound impact on their family dynamics. Additionally, the differences in complexion between Adaobi and her sister have raised questions about their lineage. It appears that Adaobi is now navigating a similar narrative, as she asserts that Tunde Ayeni is the father of her child.
Additionally, testimonies from Dr. Ayeni in court reveal inconsistencies in Adaobi’s claims. Notably, she alleges that Ayeni was involved in the child’s birth, asserting that he cut the umbilical cord—a claim that seems implausible, given that he lacks medical qualifications. This narrative further complicates the situation, suggesting a lack of clear communication and understanding between the parties involved. Dr. Ayeni’s testimony reveals that he visited some days after the child was delivered while they were still in the hospital, in an intensive environment.
Intriguingly, our investigation uncovered Dr. Ayeni’s attempts to maintain distance from Alagwu and the child since the birth, refusing to allow her to bring the baby to his residence and absenting himself from the christening. These actions appear to affirm his disassociation from both Adaobi Alagwu and the child, raising questions about the motivations behind her public declarations.
Adaobi’s decision to publicly reveal the child’s identity, including photographs and full names, stands in stark contrast to earlier protective measures taken by her legal team, who referred to the child as “baby X.” This shift raises concerns about her intentions, particularly in light of her claims that she is acting in the best interests of her daughter. If she truly prioritizes her child’s welfare, one must wonder why such desperate attempts to garner public sympathy have emerged.
Moreover, whispers of familial influence add another layer to this saga. Familiar reports suggest that Alagwu’s father and her associates (whom we’are still digging to know their identities) may be playing a crucial role in stoking the flames of this conflict, potentially leveraging the situation for his own ends. This influence could be contributing to the ongoing public spectacle and show of shame of Adaobi which threatens to tarnish not only her reputation but also that of her family and child.
Ultimately, the evidence suggests a troubling narrative where personal interests overshadow familial duty and respect for cultural traditions. If Alagwu’s goal is to create discord between Dr. Ayeni and his wife, or his associates, the unfolding events indicate that her efforts may be in vain.
Further digging into the family history shows that Adaobi has been in controversies of this nature in the past when she contested for a beauty pageant and in the process of the contest, she was disqualified when it was discovered that she once had a hidden child given to her mother to nurse as she was then too young – facts she didn’t disclose to the organizers. We further stumbled on her molestation by a close family relative. Also, we are still on the trail of the details in respect of her numerous escapades and the identities of the men she has been involved with in Abuja, Lagos and London. These are ongoing investigations, when the facts are collated, we will surely serve our audience.
As a result of this revelations, we will further dig into the photographs she might likely present which could be pictures of Dr Ayeni and the baby when he thought the child was his at one point or the other or picture of Dr Ayeni and Adaobi when he was on a trip to Italy and Adaobi had to join. These events occurred years in the past and have no relevance to the present as Dr Ayeni has long ago, completely severed the relationship with Adaobi and her baby.
As this story continues to develop, one thing remains clear: the stakes are high, and the impact of these revelations will reverberate for years to come. These continuous lies by Adaobi that are obvious to concerning minds depicts her desperation to hang on to a man who has rejected her and her child.
